Join NEABookstore State Affiliate NEA Today NEA Today
National Education Association: Members & Educators login
Teaching Experience

Teaching Research Spotlight

Block Scheduling

NEA Teacher Quality and Research Departments are providing this online venue highlighting professional research on best practices in educational issues.

Schools throughout the United States are adopting block or modular scheduling in dramatically increasing numbers. In contrast with the traditional daily six-, seven-, or eight-period schedule, a block schedule consists of three or four longer periods of daily instruction. 

The three most common forms of block scheduling are:

  1. alternate day schedule - where students and teachers meet every other day for extended time periods rather than meeting every day for shorter periods

  2. "4x4" semester plan - where students meet for 4 90-minute blocks every day over 4 quarters

  3. trimester plan - where students take two or three courses every 60 days to earn six to nine credits per year.
    Block Scheduling: A Solution or a Problem? (Education World)

Some pros and cons to these modified schedules include:

      Pros

  • Teachers see fewer students during the day, giving them more time for individualized instruction.

  • With the increased span of teaching time, longer cooperative learning activities can be completed in one class period.

  • Students have more time for reflection and less information to process over the course of a school day.

  • Teachers have extended time for planning.

      Cons

  • Teachers see students only three to four days a week which fosters a lack of continuity from day to day.

  • If a student misses a day under the modular schedule, that student is actually missing two, or sometimes even more days.

  • In a 4x4, all of the information normally taught in a semester course has to be covered in one quarter.

  • It is difficult to cover the necessary material for Advanced Placement courses in the time allotted.
    Modular [Block] Schedules  (About.com)    

What does the research say about block scheduling?  Below are links to the current research on the topic:

» Prisoners of Time – Most notable study regarding time and learning by Milton Goldberg when he was with the Department of Education. It is the best-researched piece for arguing for longer school days, a longer school year, and more time dedicated to learning. (National Education Commission on Time and Learning, April 1994)

» Block Scheduling Web Site - The Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement (CAREI) is a collaborative organization that brings the resources of the College of Education and Human Development and the University of Minnesota to bear on educational issues in Minnesota and across the nation. (University of Minnesota) 

» Block Scheduling Revisited - J. Allen Queen (PDK, 2000) provides guidelines for improving scheduling formats so that they might offer better potential for student success.

» Block Scheduling, ERIC Digest, No. 104 - Karen Irmsher (1996) explores the question What's wrong with the traditional six- or seven-period day?

See other Teaching Research Spotlights.

See other research information at NEA Research.


Have comments or suggestions?  Please contact us. 


 

 


  Archives     Printer friendly     E-mail    Subscribe 

about NEA
NEA is 3.2 million members working to provide great public schools.
NEA Connect

advertisement

NEA Member Benefits

NEA Newsletter
Subscribe to one - or all - of our newsletters.


help   contact us   change your address   sitemap   legal    privacy policy   your california privacy rights   advertise   jobs@nea

© Copyright 2002-2008 National Education Association