Skip Navigation
NEA News

How Dismantling the Department of Education Would Harm Students

Educators and parents will not stand for the destruction of our country’s commitment to equal educational opportunities for all students.
students in classroom
Published: February 4, 2025

Key Takeaways

  1. The White House is expected soon to issue an executive order to abolish the U.S. Department of Education.
  2. Stripping the department of its resources and mission would be catastrophic for the millions of students in low-income communities who need educational services and support. Civil rights protections against discrimination based on race, gender, and disability would also be gutted.
  3. The American people do not support these actions, said NEA President Becky Pringle, and educators, parents and other allies will continue to organize, advocate, and mobilize so that all students have well-resourced schools.

In a widely expected move, President Donald Trump will at any minute issue an executive order—or a series of orders—aimed at dismantling the U.S. Department of Education (ED), while also urging Congress to abolish it outright. Eliminating the department, which was established by President Jimmy Carter and Congress in 1980, due to the advocacy of NEA and others, has been a key focus of Trump’s anti-public education rhetoric, as a candidate and now as president. 

Since Inauguration Day, the White House has issued reckless, destructive, and even illegal directives to destabilize public schools and target some of our most vulnerable students. They include stripping schools of critical funding, launching national school voucher programs, providing more funding and less oversight for private charter operators, and greenlighting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids on public schools. 

The divisive culture war language (“ending radical indoctrination in K-12 schooling”) used by the administration and its allies to justify its actions does not obscure the true aims of Trump’s agenda—and the very real damage these moves will inflict, especially on the millions of low-income students across the country.

Ninety percent of U.S. students and 95% of students with disabilities learn in our public schools. Students across the country benefit from programs run by the Department of Education. Eliminating the department, National Education Association President Becky Pringle said this week, was equivalent to “giving up on our future.”

“If it became a reality,” Pringle said, “Trump’s power grab would steal resources for our most vulnerable students, explode class sizes, cut job training programs, make higher education more expensive and out of reach for middle class families, take away special education services for students with disabilities, and gut student civil rights protections.” 

"Americans did not vote for, and do not support," she added, “ending the federal government’s commitment to ensuring equal educational opportunities for every child.” 

New Calls to Abolish the Education Department 

Ever since its creation, the Department of Education has faced continued calls from right-wing politicians for its abolishment, but the current White House presents the gravest threat yet. 

The plan to close the department was a part of the GOP campaign platform and was laid out explicitly in Project 2025, a policy blueprint published by the Heritage Foundation to guide a second Trump presidency. Indeed, the very first sentence of the education section of the Project 2025 manual is: “Federal education policy should be limited and, ultimately, the federal Department of Education should be eliminated.” 

USED
Students across the country benefit from programs run by the U.S> Department of Education. Eliminating the department would be equivalent to “giving up on our future,” said NEA President Becky Pringle.

Doing so, however, requires an act of Congress. And bipartisan support for a strong federal role in ensuring a quality education for all students has in the past defeated these efforts. Just last year, the U.S. House of Representatives considered and rejected an amendment to a bill that sought to eliminate the department. More than 60 Republican members joined Democrats in turning back the effort. However, a new bill was introduced in the House last week calling for the elimination of the department by the end of 2026. 

While officially closing the doors of the Education Department may prove difficult, dismantling its key functions and stripping its funds is a very real and present danger. According to reporting in The Wall Street Journal, the White House is weighing a series of executive orders that would abolish programs that are not “explicitly in the department’s statute” and transfer other functions to other federal departments—or, in effect, gutting the Education Department without technically closing it. 

How Students and Families Will Pay the Price 

When the White House talks about dismantling Department of Education programs, it uses phrases such as “back to the states” to obscure the fact that students— especially lower-income students in rural, suburban, and urban communities and students with disabilities—will lose big. 

The Department of Education is a critical champion in enforcing federal statutes prohibiting discrimination and ensuring every student has access to an education that will help them reach their full potential. Dismantling it means defunding programs that feed, educate, and protect our most vulnerable and underserved students, and leaving many families fearful and anxious and communities reeling. 

Section with embed

Trump is prepping an executive order to dismantle the Dept. of Education, directly harming students. It will drain resources from the most vulnerable, skyrocket class sizes, make higher ed more expensive, strip special ed services, and gut student civil rights protections. We won't let this happen.

— Becky Pringle (@neapresident.bsky.social) February 3, 2025 at 7:26 PM

Here are the key programs that would be impacted: 

  • Title 1, which directs money to schools with high concentrations of students living in poverty and provides supports such as reading specialists and smaller class sizes, could be decimated if, as proposed in Project 2025, it is turned into block grants and handed over to individual states—without any sort of accountability or oversight.  According to an analysis by the Center for American Progress, 180,000 teaching positions could be lost, affecting 2.8 million students in low-income communities.
  • Roughly 7.5 million students, or 15 percent of the student population, receive special education under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which provides $15 billion to support students with disabilities. This program could be transferred to another agency, making it significantly less likely that students with disabilities receive the services and support they need and deserve.
  • Many expect the White House to move the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights to the Department of Justice, a move that would severely weaken its ability to protect students against discrimination based on race, gender, and disability. The absence of strong federal oversight would leave millions of students vulnerable to discrimination, leading to lower levels of motivation and academic achievement and a higher risk of dropping out.
  • The Education Department also administers Pell Grants, federal student loans, and loan repayment and forgiveness programs. Thirty percent of U.S. college students rely on these federal loans to pay their tuition. Students and families could lose this support, leading to more students dropping out, fewer choices, and fewer options for families.  

‘Educators Won’t Be Silent’ 

By stripping the Department of Education of resources and authority, the White House and its allies would be able to turbocharge key tenets of the extremist anti-public education agenda already being implemented at the state level in many parts of the country. Private school vouchers are at the top of this list. 

“The intent is clear,” said Pringle. “Starve our public schools of the resources our students need and funnel these resources to discriminatory and unaccountable private schools or tax cuts for billionaires who funded his campaign.”

Just last week, Trump signed an executive order designed to drain resources from our public schools through vouchers—a catastrophic idea that, when put directly in front of voters, is resoundingly rejected. 

And according to a recent Wall Street Journal poll, more than 60 percent of voters opposed dismantling the Department of Education, with similar majorities supporting prioritizing education funding over tax cuts.  Families across the country support strong public schools because they understand students need more opportunities, more resources, and greater protections, not less. 

“Educators won’t be silent as anti-public education politicians try to steal opportunities from our students, our families, and our communities across America,” Pringle said. “Together with parents and allies, we will continue to organize, advocate, and mobilize so that all students have well-resourced schools that allow every student to grow into their full brilliance.” 

Get more from

We're here to help you succeed in your career, advocate for public school students, and stay up to date on the latest education news. Sign up to stay informed.
National Education Association logo

Great public schools for every student

The National Education Association (NEA), the nation's largest professional employee organization, is committed to advancing the cause of public education. NEA's 3 million members work at every level of education—from pre-school to university graduate programs. NEA has affiliate organizations in every state and in more than 14,000 communities across the United States.